Judicial Activism vs. Judicial Restraint: A Critical Analysis in the Indian Context
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36676/ijl.2023-v1i1-03Keywords:
Judicial Activism, Judicial Restraint, Indian JudiciaryAbstract
This paper delves into the contrasting concepts of judicial activism and judicial restraint within the framework of the Indian judiciary. It provides a historical perspective on their evolution and influence, and then undertakes a comprehensive examination of their impact on the Indian legal system, democratic governance, and judicial legitimacy. Through an analysis of seminal cases and scholarly perspectives, this paper seeks to elucidate the delicate equilibrium that must be maintained between judicial activism and restraint for the effective functioning of India's legal and political institutions.
References
Chowdhury, P. R. (2011). Judicial activism and human rights in India: A critical appraisal. The International Journal of Human Rights, 15(7), 1055–1071. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2010.482912
Gunatilleke, G. D. (n.d.). Judicial Activism Revisited: Reflecting on the Role of Judges in enforcing Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.
Moen, O. O. (2004). New Judicial Federalism: The Rehnquist Court, Judicial Activism, and Devolution. American Studies in Scandinavia, 36(2), 49–76. https://doi.org/10.22439/asca.v36i2.4479
Rahman, M., & Badhon, R. Z. (n.d.). A Critical Analysis on Judicial Activism and Overreach.
Singh, H., Kumar, V., Samadhiya, P., & Rohira, K. (2023). The Judicial Adventurism under the realm of Judicial Review in India: A Critical Analysis.
Temper, L., & Martinez-Alier, J. (2013). The god of the mountain and Godavarman: Net Present Value, indigenous territorial rights and sacredness in a bauxite mining conflict in India. Ecological Economics, 96, 79–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.09.011
