Judicial Activism vs. Judicial Restraint: A Comparative Review of Landmark Cases
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36676/ijl.v2.i4.49Keywords:
judicial activism, judicial restraint, interpretation of the law, landmark casesAbstract
The concepts of judicial activism and judicial restraint have long been central to debates about the role of the judiciary in interpreting and enforcing the law. Judicial activism refers to a more proactive role for judges in shaping policy and protecting rights, often leading to decisions that go beyond strict interpretation of the law. Judicial restraint, on the other hand, emphasizes a more conservative approach, where judges defer to the decisions of elected representatives and adhere closely to the text of the law. This paper provides a comparative review of landmark cases that illustrate these opposing judicial philosophies. By analyzing key decisions from different jurisdictions, the paper explores the implications of judicial activism and restraint for democracy, the rule of law, and the balance of power between branches of government.
References
• Bickel, A. M. (1986). The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. Yale University Press.
• Bhadani, U. (2024). Smart Grids: A Cyber– Physical Systems Perspective. In International Research Journal of Engineering and
Technology (IRJET) (Vol. 11, Issue 06, p. 801). https://www.irjet.net
• Chaudhary, D. (2022). A review of Recent trends in Supreme Court and Indian Parliament. Universal Research Reports, 9(2), 39–44.
Retrieved from https://urr.shodhsagar.com/index.php/j/article/view/974
• Dr. Neeraj Malik. (2024). MENS REA. Innovative Research Thoughts, 10(3), 78–84. https://doi.org/10.36676/irt.v10.i3.1437
• Ely, J. H. (1980). Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review. Harvard University Press.
• Epstein, L., & Knight, J. (1998). The Choices Justices Make. CQ Press.
• Kashyap, B., Sachdeva, V., Shirahatti, A., Singh, G., Arya, A., Jagatheesan, S. and Kumar, C., 2023. A Novel Approach for Human
Behaviour Prediction Using Deep Learning Algorithms. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering,
(1), pp.793-801.
• Kaushik, N. (2023). Pile of Files: Remedies to Unburden the Honourable. Universal Research Reports, 10(1), 46–49. Retrieved from
https://urr.shodhsagar.com/index.php/j/article/view/1062
• Klarman, M. J. (2004). From Jim Crow to Civil Rights: The Supreme Court and the Struggle for Racial Equality. Oxford University
Press.
• Koteshwar Ramesh Rakesh, Akbar Hussain (2021). Personality Factors in Choice Blindness. Shodh Sanchar Bulletin, 11(41) 158-162.
• Kumari, R. (2018). Study about Writs in India and Habeas Corpus in India. Universal Research Reports, 5(1), 122–125. Retrieved from
https://urr.shodhsagar.com/index.php/j/article/view/496
• Mandeep Kumar. (2023). A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS IN INDIA: A COMPARATIVE
STUDY WITH THE UNITED KINGDOM. Innovative Research Thoughts, 9(2), 197–201. Retrieved from
https://irt.shodhsagar.com/index.php/j/article/view/717
• Sanju Purohit, SMART SOLUTIONS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY AND CLIMATE Changes’ 10(4), doi: 10.46587/JGR.
v10i01.016.
• Sharma, S. (2023). Judicial Activism vs. Judicial Restraint: A Critical Analysis in the Indian Context. Indian Journal of Law, 1(1), 18–25.
https://doi.org/10.36676/ijl.2023-v1i1-03
• Singh, G., Singh, A., Singh, B. (2021). Incorporation of Additional Modules Within Particle Swarm Optimization for Feasibility
Conditions of Multi-index Transportation Problem. In: Abraham, A., Hanne, T., Castillo, O., Gandhi, N., Nogueira Rios, T., Hong, TP.
(eds) Hybrid Intelligent Systems. HIS 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1375. Springer, Cham.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73050-5_76
• Soma Chakraborty. (2023). Assessing the Impact of National Green Tribunal on the Development of Environmental Jurisprudence in
India. International Journal for Research Publication and Seminar, 14(1), 127–136. Retrieved from
https://jrps.shodhsagar.com/index.php/j/article/view/350
• Subhash Kumar. (2024). Judicial Activism vs. Judicial Restraint: Balancing the Role of the Courts in a Democratic Society. Indian
Journal of Law, 2(2), 5–8. https://doi.org/10.36676/ijl.v2.i2.02
• Sunil Kumar Singh. (2024). Exploring the Impact of Judicial Activism on Legal Precedent: A Comparative Analysis. Indian Journal of
Law, 2(2), 23–26. https://doi.org/10.36676/ijl.v2.i2.06
• Sunstein, C. R. (1999). One Case at a Time: Judicial Minimalism on the Supreme Court. Harvard University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Indian Journal of Law
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.