The Influence of International Humanitarian Law on Armed Conflicts: Case Studies from Recent History

Abstract

The primary goal of international humanitarian law (IHL) is to reduce the severity of war on all parties involved, including civilians and soldiers. By looking at how these legal frameworks have affected the conduct of both state and non-state actors, the safeguarding of civilians, and the administration of justice in the aftermath of armed conflicts, this article aims to provide light on the impact of international humanitarian law (IHL) on contemporary wars. This study examines the efficacy of international humanitarian law (IHL) in reducing human suffering and holding violators accountable through a number of case studies, including the conflicts in Syria, Yemen, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo. the difficulties of applying classical legal standards in contemporary combat due to factors such as asymmetrical conflicts, non-state actors' participation, and technology improvements, makes it more difficult to enforce international humanitarian law (IHL). Furthermore, the function of supranational organizations like the UN and the International Criminal Court (ICC) in enforcing adherence to IHL and resolving infractions via diplomatic and legal means.