SECESSION, RECOGNITION, AND INTERNATIONAL LAW: THE CASES OF KOSOVO, SOUTH SUDAN, AND SOMALILAND
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36676/ijl.v3.i4.99Keywords:
Secession, Recognition, International Law, Statehood, Kosovo, South Sudan, Somaliland, Self-DeterminationAbstract
A major open topic in international law is whether or not a group can legitimately secede from an existing state and be acknowledged as a sovereign entity. Although some areas have been able to declare independence, others are still in a precarious diplomatic and legal position. Understanding how the international legal system handles secession and recognition is the purpose of this study, which explores three such cases: Kosovo, South Sudan, and Somaliland. There is a clear trajectory in each of these cases: one leads to a unilateral proclamation, another to negotiations, and the third to long-standing self-governance without international recognition. “This paper uses these cases to investigate the practical application or neglect of concepts like statehood, territorial integrity, and self-determination. Inconsistencies characterize the worldwide reaction to secessionist attempts, and this study shows how recognition is based more on political backing than on legal standards.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Indian Journal of Law

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.