A comparative analysis of corporate governance and CSR: lessons from India, UK and USA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36676/ijl.v3.i3.106Keywords:
Corporate Governance, Corporate Social Responsibility, CSR Regulations, India, Shareholder Primacy, Stakeholder Approach, Business EthicsAbstract
Corporate governance and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) define business practices, engagement of stakeholders, and regulatory compliance, thereby guiding ethical and sustainable functioning of corporations. “This article compares corporate governance and CSR systems in India, the UK, and the USA by means of an analysis of their regulatory systems, governance structures, and approaches to corporate responsibility. India has formalized CSR and required that certain businesses commit money for social initiatives by way of the Companies Act, 2013. The UK uses a principle-based corporate governance model with a comply or explain approach under ESG standards, therefore encouraging voluntary yet regimented CSR projects. Although CSR is primarily voluntary, molded by institutional investors and corporate activism, the USA promotes shareholder value preservation by means of legislation like the Sarbanes-Oxley and Dodd-Frank Acts utilizing its market-driven governance framework. Important differences among these countries in regulatory enforcement, stakeholder orientation, and governance theories are underlined in the study. It also suggests best practices that might enhance corporate governance and CSR performance wherever. By means of research of institutional complementarities and governance-CSR connections, this paper provides insights on encouraging transparency, responsibility, and sustainable corporate operations for lawmakers, businesses, and stakeholders. The findings support the wider general discussion on moral corporate conduct in a contemporary worldwide society.
References
Arora, Nischay, and Balwinder Singh. Corporate governance and underpricing of small and medium enterprises IPOs in India. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society (2020).
Goel, Puneeta. Rising standards of sustainability reporting in India. Journal of Indian Business Research (2018).
Governance, risk management, compliances and ethics (ICSI) page 10-136. www.icsi.edu
Goyal, Rita, Nada Kakabadse, and Andrew Kakabadse. "Improving corporate governance with functional diversity on FTSE 350 boards: directors’ perspectiv Journal of Capital Markets Studies (2019).
Jadiyappa, N., Sireesha, B., Hickman, L. E., & Jyothi, P. (2019). Multiple banking relationships, agency costs and firm value: evidence from India. Managerial Finance.
Mishra, Rakesh Kumar, and Sheeba Kapil. "Board characteristics and firm value for Indian companies." Journal of Indian Business Research (2018).
Pahi, Debasis, and Inder Sekhar Yadav. "Does corporate governance affect dividend policy in India? Firm-level evidence from new indices." Managerial Finance (2019).
Qurashi, Mubashir Hassan. "Corporate governance code comparison for South Asian emerging economies." International Journal of Law and Management (2018).
Shukla, Ankur, Sivasankaran Narayanasamy, Kanagaraj Ayyalusamy, and Saurabh Kaushik Pandya. "Influence of independent directors on the market risks of Indian banks." Journal of Asia Business Studies (2020).
Srivastava, Varnita, Niladri Das, and Jamini Kanta Pattanayak. "Corporate governance: mapping the change." International Journal of Law and Management (2018).
Suman, Samridhi, and Shveta Singh. "Corporate governance mechanisms and corporate investments: evidence from India." International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management (2020).
Uzma, Shigufta Hena. "Corporate governance practices: global convergence and Indian perspective." Qualitative Research in Financial Markets (2018).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Indian Journal of Law

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.